Saturday, 22 February 2020

sex: the ins & outs of womanhood under the patriarchy

Some weeks ago, as I left the gym at 9 pm on a Thursday, stalker in tow, a strange thought occurred to me. Why was I being stalked? Why was a random stranger from the gym now following me down a dark street to my car, asking me if I am single and why I won't be his friend? Was this normal? Quizzically, I ran to my car, immediately locked my doors, drove home, and spent the next 24 hours staring at my bedroom ceiling, wishing I'd never been born. 

I never went back to the gym again. 


Sometimes I think about the weird 2004 science fiction thriller The Butterfly Effect. It was the sleepover movie to watch when I was 11. I feel like I was forever traumatised by that movie because in one of his timelines he loses his arms and in another timeline his friend's dad was a paedophile. I think someone also set fire to a puppy at some point. 

While maybe not appropriate for an 11-year-old, this movie introduced a new concept to my life. The idea that even the smallest actions have impacts; that nothing exists in a vacuum. Like when a butterfly flaps its wings in Chicago, and Tokyo is destroyed by a meteorite. Haters will say these are unrelated. 

The fact that small actions and ideas can incite larger, sometimes unintended consequences makes men like the one who followed me out of the gym all the more scary to me. I guess it just causes me to wonder what has happened during his life to make him think what he did was normal or OK. Has he heard or observed other men acting like this? Or has he just been raised in a world in which women are objects; without agency, opinions, and preferences?

This man was a complete stranger. And when he cornered me outside of the gym that night his first words to me were: "are you single?". That was clearly the only thing about me that was important to this man. Not my name, my age, what I do for a living; it was only my apparent availability to him that mattered.

The absurdity of some random man ambushing me outside the gym to ask me if I’m single was the implication that if I answered yes I was automatically available to him. And while I understand that the best way to get rid of men is to tell them that your dad is a police officer / prison guard and your boyfriend is a WWE heavyweight champion / serial killer, I just wished that I could tell him that whether or not I am single is entirely irrelevant.

In the past year or so I have lost count of all the times random men on the street have come up to  me asking questions they have no business asking. If I'm single? Where I'm from? If I'm Italian? If I can show them where to buy an umbrella? If I like pears (???) ?

Maybe they were not all sex traffickers as I generally assume. And mAYBE that one guy just really needed an umbrella. However: I still resent the fact that I should be open and willing to interact with any random man who sees me on the street and feels like talking to me. But this is a universal experience for women. We are expected to at least pretend to be happy to engage with strangers on the street. To be unwilling to do so can appear impolite or socially inept.  And the threat of appearing this way feels like its own kind of trap: and it functions as a means of controlling women's behaviour and responses.




When you grow up in white middle class suburban New Zealand it might be easy to think that you don't need feminism. And for most of my youth I wasn't astutely cognisant that there were any extra difficulties that came with being a woman. Perhaps it wasn't until I was 15 years old, and studying The Handmaid's Tale in English class, that I gained some clarity. In the same year, Elisabeth Fritzl was discovered after 24 years being kept as a prisoner in her father's basement. It was a big year for my personal & abrupt realisations about the mistreatment and abuse of women by men.

Over the last few years I have reflected more and more on womanhood and society. With every example or experience of misogyny, I felt that I could see connections, draw lines between apparently isolated events, like a map of the constellations. I imagined that every sexist comment or action by a man was made because he had witnessed a man do this before him. It's like, on one side of the world a man makes a sexist joke, and on the other side of the world, a woman is raped and murdered. (Haters will say these are unrelated.)

And it is true that women experience varying magnitudes of oppression depending on where they are in the world. Sometimes it feels selfish to complain about my own experiences when there are women in Saudi Arabia who aren't even allowed to go outside. In a world where female genital mutilation, child brides, male guardians, honour killings, etc, etc, exist, is it wrong to be dissatisfied with my own personal freedoms ?

But no matter where you are in the world, it is hard to be a women. Countless studies show gender discrimination in workplaces, wage disparities, societal stigma around periods / breast feeding /  female body hair / & so much more. And women are raped and murdered by men in every country in the world.

*

A few years ago I listened to a Ted Talk by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, called 'We should all be feminists'. Until I listening to this Ted Talk I had not heard feminism, its importance and its meaning, so aptly and perfectly described and summarised in a 30 minute speech. I remember clearly a part where she says she was first accused of being a feminist: 'I don't remember what this particular argument was about, but I remember that as I argued and argued, Okuloma looked at me and said, "You know, you're a feminist." It was not a compliment. I could tell from his tone, the same tone that you would use to say something like "You're a supporter of terrorism."'. 

With this, I recalled when I was first introduced to the concept feminism. I was too young at that time to understand it well, however, I do remember the implication that feminism was something for ugly women, who don't shave, and who cannot find a man to love them. Feminism was a negative word when I learned it. It felt like a warning, of something to avoid. I think that this was a ploy, to make feminism into something unattractive, it was as though to call yourself a feminist was to call yourself ugly and unlovable.

But as I got older I changed the way I thought about feminism. I realised; if I didn't support my own rights, who would? And the world changed too. Even over my own lifetime I have observed societal change in the realm of women's rights. But change happens frustratingly slowly. Sometimes I feel that I will be long dead by the time women have equal rights, if ever they do.



Recommended link:

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: We should all be feminists


Monday, 20 January 2020

Reduce, Reuse, Resign yourself to the planet's inevitable demise


it has become impossible to remain unaware regarding the rapidly escalating climate emergency we are facing. even though Greta Thunberg is both better and younger than me i still feel like reflecting on this topic. over the last few years we have been reminded of things that we, as individuals, can do to lessen our environmental impact. however, it often feels that even the culmination of our individual efforts to recycle more can do little to offset the profound and substantial damage that has already occurred. 

while scientist's concern about climate change began during or before the 1950s, it has only taken about 70 years and some white people in Australia to lose their houses in a fire for global warming to truly become a hot topic that is impossible to ignore (although some people certainly try)




every day it feels wrong to continue life as usual, as if climate change is not upon us. yet every day i continue my life as usual. unfortunately, in the event that i don't imminently die in a climate change related fire / tsunami / meteorite strike reminiscent of the 1998 drama/sci-fi Deep Impact then i still need to have a job :/  

i am aware of the ways in which i can reduce the impact that i have on the environment, but is it enough? for as long as corporations & capitalism destroy the planet in exchange for profits my own efforts feel inconsequential. sometimes i feel like i should just lie down in the street and die like the elephant man as a means of reducing my carbon footprint. 

?should the responsibility to save the world fall to individuals while BP and Exxon or whatevr cause 90% of all climate emissions? while i do think the average consumer can make some changes which would be to the benefit of the environment, will these efforts really have a deep impact?

speaking of Deep Impact (1998) i remember first seeing parts of this movie as a young child. a deep & impactful exploration into the end of humanity via environmental cataclysm; it took me almost 20 years to find this movie again as all i had to go on was a vague and distant memory of Elijah Wood on a moped. this movie actually has nothing to do with climate change although it depicts an environmental emergency in which most of the population dies in a series of tsunamis while the world's 'elite' either seek refuge in a network of interconnecting caves constructed inside the earth or go to Mars or something.

i recall as a child seeing the final scene of the movie in which the movie's protagonist and her estranged father stand on an empty beach as the first tsunami approaches, accepting that death is inescapable. 

Saturday, 28 September 2019

GOD IS DEAD: reconciliation of antediluvian convictions in a contemporary époque // the final boss battle


They say that you cannot separate the art from the artist, but what if the artist is God and the art is rampant sexual abuse?


A disclaimer:
I have some experience growing up under the influence of Catholicism. Over my lifetime I have gone from bible-basher (person who lives by the bible (sort of)) to actual bible-basher (person who beats up bibles). Consequently, I feel that this qualifies me to say whatever I want about religion, without having to accept criticism of any kind.

As a resolute atheist and natural skeptic, I have, since becoming devoutly anti-Catholic in 2010, become more and more consumed by my hate for all things religion. This hate was not only for the institution itself, but extended towards those who chose to uphold it. However, due to several recent epiphanies, I have begun to question this unwavering contempt, and instead: I want to understand. 

I want to understand religious people. Your average religious Joe, that is. Because while we all hate the Mother Teresas, and the Pope Benedict IIVIXCIs, and the [more modern powerful influential religious figures],, there are ..possibly.. many, many religious people out there who actually aren't hurting anyone. 

Unbridled rage and hatred is a young mans game, and I am a 26 year old woman. Through this blogpost I seek to understand how religious people (specifically: Catholics) are able to reconcile the abhorrent scandals & archaic worldview of the Catholic church with the rest of society,,, and: how I am able to reconcile the fact that Catholic people exist with my own personal peace. 


***

1. Catholic scandal

The Catholic Church is no stranger to scandal. We all know the unfortunate fates of the poor altar boys who suffered at the hands of depraved Catholic priests. Evidence suggests that these victims are predominantly boys between the ages of 11 and 14, but sometimes are as young as three years old. The Church has been e x p o s e d by countless accusations since the 1980s, but only garnered media attention from the 1990s onward, and investigations only began in the 2000s. 

To make matters even worse, Pope Francis has revealed in his (somewhat) recent tell-all that Catholic priests have been keeping nuns as sex slaves. Reports reveal that these nuns have suffered repeated instances of rape and in some cases have been forced by the priests to have abortions. 

It appears that, in the Catholic faith, one is considered a second class citizen if they are a boy under the age of 14 or a woman of any age. And yet, altar boys still exist (maybe?..haven't been to a church in a while so not sure?), and there are many woman out there in the world who voluntarily practice Catholicism.  

My question for all the practicing Catholics out  there: do you not consider your wife, your son, your sister/mother/neighbour's son/son's friend Timothy/daughter/illegitimate male child/grandmother/etc to be  h u m a n  people, deserving of bodily autonomy and the right to live life free from molestation??? ??

I guess what I'm wondering is: how does one, in 2019, justifying supporting an institution in which the old-rich-white-man archetype is ride or die, and everyone else is a casualty and a victim?


2. Catholic guilt

Obviously, priests-gone-wild raises many questions vis-a-vis the true morals of Catholicism. Premarital sex, abortion, homosexuality; all condemned by the church (not to mention paedophilia & rape which is condemned by everyone) and yet come into play as part of these not-so-recent revelations. To be Catholic is to deprive oneself of many kinds of personal freedoms, however, those enforcing the rules do not themselves abide by them. It is a total 'do as I say not as I do' situation.

And yet Catholics everywhere still appear to wish to follow these rules. It is my interpretation that these people may in fact be victims themselves.

Consider New Zealand's most lovable cult: Gloriavale. A devoutly Christian society in which all woman must work in the kitchen, all men must plow the fields, and everyone must have no less than 13 children. Although it is a totally sexist society I still believe that the men and women alike are all victims and servants to the only people who actually benefit from Gloriavale; aka those at the top: Neville Cooper the convicted child rapist (now deceased), and his gang of paedophiles. 

Just like in Gloriavale I believe that your average run-of-the-mill Catholic woman OR man is kind of a victim of their own beliefs. Sure, women have it worse as misogyny is part of the very essence of all religion, but there are many men out there who also live by these arbitrary and strict rules. Just like in Gloriavale, the only people who truly benefit from Catholicism are those at the top: Pope Francis and HIS gang of paedophiles. 

Knowing this, I question if my hate for Catholics is misplaced, and wonder if I could instead feel a modicum of compassion for them? They are the ones who suffer because of religion. And if they are not forcing their religious views onto anyone else, are they actually hurting anyone? 


3. Reconciliation

My biggest question regarding modern day Catholics is: how is anyone able to be a part of and support the Catholic church knowing that those who are large & in charge are;

1. not following their own rules, and;
2. actual paedophiles and rapists ?

I guess there must be some way in which Catholics are able to separate their own faith from the paedophilia, abuse, & sex slavery that the Catholic Church has come to know and love.

Currently there are 1.2 billion self-described Catholics worldwide. That is over half of all Christians. That is a lot of ppl willing to put their name on something that is inextricably linked with abuse and corruption.

I had previously assumed that if someone is OK with calling themselves Catholic, and attending Catholic Church, and going to anti-abortion rallies with their Catholic friends, then they must be OK with whatever is going on at the Vatican behind closed doors. Perhaps this isn't the case. I guess I may never understand the goings-on in someone's personal faith, and whatever personal deals they have with God or whatever: but I suppose if someone keeps their religion away from politics and other people's lives and accepts that if they are free to practice Catholicism then other people should be free to live without religious restraints, then maybe,, m a y b e,, m  a  y  b  e,,,, I  can live with that.


***

Thursday, 26 July 2018

Pro-Life Protests: the joys of taking away a woman's right





I still remember the first time I was introduced to the concept of abortion.

I was like 10 years old. My family is Irish so we were attending this Irish Catholic church in Hamilton called St Patrick's or somethingggg. As we filed through the church foyer to enter the main building I caught sight of a small poster pinned to the church noticeboard. 

The poster featured a picture of a fully formed foetus, a close-up on its creepy face, and the caption 'Pls don't kill mE' (or something like that..). I remember thinking, kill? a baby? ??? Whatever this abortion business is, it must be BAD NEWZ. 

Fast forward 15 years. Reflecting on that moment, in the church atrium, I can now see, clear as day, how deliberately misleading and manipulating that poster was. Not only are abortions not performed on foetuses anywhere near as developed as the one on that poster, but foetuses actually! can't! talk!, so that caption was almost definitely not written by an actual foetus. 

((Which means that,,, some grown up adult man or woman,,, actually wrote that caption, from the point of view of a foetus, which is quite. creepy. actually. Especially because. They have no idea if that is even what the foetus would have wanted to say.))

Scrolling through RNZ today, I came across a news article about a pro-life protest that occurred yesterday in Wellington. waht. I thought to myself. Is this 2018 or 1818? Turns out, it was 1818. At least to some people. A pro-life group, Voice for Life, had put 13,285 pairs of knitted baby boots outside parliament to protest the number of abortions that occurred in New Zealand in 2017. The protesters were calling for tighter abortion laws, in wake of a push to make abortion more accessible in New Zealand following the abortion reform in Ireland earlier this year. 

The president of Voice for Life, Jacqui DeRuiter, lead the protest. She wanted to prove to parliament that more liberal abortion laws were not called for in New Zealand. In exchange for her proposed denial of healthcare to women she offers: more support for mothers. Whether Ms DeRuiters is offering to pay for everyone's medical bills and is opening an orphanage to take in every child of a women who was stripped of the human right of bodily autonomy is unclear, her archaic and offensive views, however, were not. 

Currently, under New Zealand's 4000 year old abortion law, women must obtain the permission of two certifying consultants to have an abortion, which must be justified under the Crimes Act. This costs the New Zealand taxpayer over $5 million per year in consultant fees, so I am genuinely s h o c k e d that Ms DeRuiters and the other members of Voice for Life are able to afford the wool for 13,285 knitted boots when they obviously love putting so much money towards robbing women of their rights. 

Perhaps even more shockingly; rape, age, and financial situation are not legal grounds for obtaining an abortion. The majority of abortions in New Zealand are granted on mental health grounds, and the average time it takes to get access to an abortion from the time of the first GP referral is 25 days. 

Despite my disdain and hatred for the pro-life movement, I manage to have a microgram of understanding. I still remember what it was like to be 10 years old and momentarily deceived by a church bulletin board. Churches are notorious for their general hatred of women, and unfortunately, still have a lot of sway over the opinions of the populous, even though God has basically been debunked by child poverty.

Encouragingly, nearly twice the amount of people attended yesterday's protest in order to protest the protest. And while I sadly believe that churches might be here to stay, I still have faith. I have faith that our out-dated laws will slowly change. Because like, if Ireland can do it, pretty sure anyone can do it..........  

Sunday, 26 November 2017

Tale as Old as Time: The Mercilessness of Time and the Tragedy of Ageing




Have you ever wondered why there are such high rates of elder abuse at rest homes, but the rates of child abuse at the same rest homes are much lower? Or do you wonder why the enchanted mirror said Snow White was the fairest of them all even though Charlize Theron is a perfect 10? I'm sad to report that we,, as a society,, live in a society.

A society that  h a t e s  old people.

And I'm not just talking about people over the age of 100 here. Society's ageism applies to anyone who no longer fits into the youthful ideals of physical beauty. But ageism doesn't stop there. This situation is more similar to the Two-Pronged Attack Yu-Gi-Oh card than it is to literally anything else. Ageism is far more apparent for women than it is for men, which creates something of an ageism-sexism axis. 'Sexageism', or 'agesexism': two terms that I just now made up, pretty much describe the unfortunate fate of any woman who;

a) dares to be born, and:

b) has the n e r v e to grow older than age 35

I feel like I am exactly the perfect person to write about this. As a woman, I know what it is like to be a woman. And as a 24 year old, I know basically everything else. 

Studies show* that the older a person becomes, the less beautiful they are perceived by people in all age brackets. This is pretty aptly demonstrated in James Cameron's famous mockumentary, Titanic, where Rose, a beautiful young fire-starter, tragically ages 84 years, while in typical patriarchal form, the male character of the movie never ages, and stays young and beautiful (albeit dead) forever. In the distressing conclusion of the movie it is revealed that we, the viewers, were the old lady from Titanic all along. 

When I turned 24 I had the peculiar feeling that I was slightly older than I was when I was 23.  I got scared. I felt like Benjamin Button in reverse. I knew the end was nigh for me so I went straight to the Countdown skincare section and bought one of everything. I was determined to stay young. I wanted to be the real life Peter Pan. I refused to give the haters what I knew they wanted most of all: The opportunity to target me with their sexist, ageist ideologies, and cast me to the fringes of society, where I would live out the rest of my days knitting scarves to cover my hideous, ageing face. 

But in my quest to be forever young I had a realisation. In my efforts to evade the pressures of society, I had unwittingly done the very thing that society had been pressuring me to do. Somehow, by attempting to defy societal expectations, I had fully conformed to those expectations. I had been buying into --literally 'buying': skincare ain't cheap :''''( --  the idea that there is something wrong with the natural process of getting older. Is it possible that to truly disregard society, and oppose the ageism, I should instead embrace my ageing? Nobody knows!!!. But it takes an empowered woman to throw caution into the river, and age gracefully. And at the young and impressionable age I am at currently, I am just not ready to brave the callous world without multi-active anti-ageing facial serum. So for the next 10 years you can find me in the Countdown skincare section, crying into a face mask  :''''''''(


*probably

Thursday, 17 August 2017

Why Must I Suffer in Endless and Unrelenting Torment Until I Eventually Die and Other Tales


Me @ My Childhood


Chapter 1. Why Was I Born?

At my previous job, about 5 months ago, I was standing at the bathroom sink: mentally preparing to go to the interview for my current job and attempting to brush my teeth with a wet wipe. Then, all at once, with the violent abruptness of a piano falling from the top of a 15 storey high-rise, I was wholly consumed with feelings of unadulterated misery and emotional disquiet.

"Jobs", or as I call them: ''Carpet-weavers, Morocco' imagined'  are something of a double edged sword. Yes, you need them in order to get that $cash money$, but seriously: at. what. cost.?

Trading in my precious youth at a job I hate just to make enough money to put food on the table for my future illegitimate child so that they can grow up to get their own job that they hate ???? It is a literal nightmare of unyielding proportions. 

Worse than the job itself, though, is the job interview - a shameless charade in which one must convince someone that they want to be hired for a job that they don't even want. Never do I feel more like I am selling my soul to 'The Man' than when I am citing my attention to detail and unabating dedication to the menial. It is a ceaseless cycle of despair, and one that I will be trapped in until my best years are behind me, and I'm more ""Grandmother Willow"" than I am ""Little Mermaid"". 

And so, at that moment, standing in that bathroom, I was struck by the question: truly, what is this hellish thing we call existence, and w h y must I be a part of it?


Chapter 2. Reflection

Sometimes, I reflect on my childhood: a joyous time when my future seemed as bright as the blinding white light of the sun - kind of like when you accidentally open the lid of a photocopier when it is still mid-scan and go blind for 6 minutes. A time when my life lay before me as a series of endless pathways, so plentiful were my opportunities, that I was afraid to choose one for the fear of choosing wrong. The world was my lobster back then, and I thought that was how it would always be. 

Tragically, however; time is a cruel and unforgiving mistress and I am her subservient whore. Gone are the naive plans and idealistic ambitions of my youth, buried forever in the field of dead hopes and dreams. 

I can only assume that I have done nothing wrong and that this is all entirely the fault of society. I recently read Frankenstein and discovered that the true monster was humanity all along. (But also Frankenstein's literal monster who was killing the townspeople and stealing huskies and etc.).

As much as all of this makes me want to revert to a pre-verbal level and live out my days in the hospital from Girl, Interrupted I feel that I must persevere. But only because I know that is what Julie Andrews would tell me to do.

So I sit at my desk, day after day, and stare out the window, fantasizing about the day when technology has advanced such that I can build a robot who is indistinguishable from myself and has no capacity to understand slave labour laws. She will masquerade as me at my job by day, and be my sex slave by night, and this will finally afford me enough time for leisure activities like reading gardening magazines in the sunshine (or something??). 

But until that day I have to go to my job myself, like a chump....... 

Monday, 30 January 2017

Where Are They Now: Vhol Interview 2.0


Adoration of the Magi (The Epiphany), Hieronymus Bosch c. 1485 - 1500

Close to 3 years ago, I interviewed a young man; he was a prodigy, a vanguard, the voice of his generation. Shortly thereafter, I interviewed my friend Vhol!!! If you would like to see this interview, you can click here !

Seasons change: leaves fall off trees, the ocean becomes low tide, and people also change, like when Kanye went b l o n d e. And Vhol? He probably changed too, even if he still has the exact same hideous sandals 3 years later.

So where is he now and who is he now? Read on to see the pressing questions that will again give us an invaluable insight to the man behind the Vhol circa 2017.


1. Never be able to watch cricket again, or never be able to make an Excel spreadsheet again?

I've gotta think about this one... I think... never be able to make a spreadsheet again because I could write them down in a book... like one of those maths books with all the grids. Man that's really tough though. That's ruthless. But yeah, I love cricket. Man.

2. Would you rather live 100 years in the future or 1000 years in the future?

To be honest I reckon 100 years in the future is gonna be pretty average and I don't hold much hope for 1000 years in the future either, but I kinda wanna go there to see how crazy it is, so I'd choose 1000 years.

3. Would you f*ck Hillary Clinton and why / why not?

Um... is this assuming that I'm not dating Elizabeth? [Yes]. Can you make sure you include that disclaimer? Okay... no. No i wouldn't. I don't have any desire to sleep with Hillary Clinton. I'd rather sleep with Prince Charles, ahaha! Love that guy. 

4. Shoot, shag, marry: Hitler, Donald Trump, KimDotCom ?

I have to shoot Hitler out of principle. But that means I have to have sex with either Donald Trump or KimDotCom!!! ...This could be a crazy call, but maybe I'll actually marry Hitler, because as his attractive and manipulative wife I could change the course of history. Then I would shag KimDotCom and shoot Donald Trump.

6.  What is one thing you would take with you to a deserted island?

Maybe a rugby ball, and then it could be like Castaway 2 and I could call him Gilbert... hahaha coz it's a rugby ball brand!! Instead of Wilson like Tom Hanks!! And I love kicking rugby balls, its super fun. And then when I get saved I could come back and be the best goal kicker in the world. 

7. What is the angriest you've ever been and why / why not?

One time when I was about 7 I got really angry at my parents and I went into my room and I was so angry I tried to lift up my dressing table and I slammed my fist down on a toy car hoping that I would get super-saiyan strength. I hoped that I was going to turn super-saiyan. I was pretty mad then. 

8. Have you ever considered cloning yourself and keeping the clone as a sex slave and why / why not?

I've never considered it but now I am. No, that's so disturbing, I definitely wouldn't do that. It would be cool to just have my clone around, but I wouldn't keep it as a sex slave. If we loved each other it would happen naturally. 

9. What if your clone consented to being a sex slave tho ?

You read my mind!... No! Would you clone yourself and use it as a sex slave? [Yeah, maybe]. Are you writing that down? [Yes]. Do you want to clone me and use my clone as a sex slave? [No]. What's wrong with m e ??